auto auto again

[Charles]

I agree, it certainly is easy to miss.  I imagine he doesn't want to 
introduce a new keyword for it , but renox's syntax of := I think is an 
elegant solution !



Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> "renox" <renosky at free.fr> wrote in message 
> news:ec2of6$2rj6$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
> 
>> If memory serves, Walter current view is:
>> a) For stack variable MyClass c = MyClass(); or auto c = MyClass();
>> and
>> b) For global variable MyClass c = new MyClass(); or auto c = new 
>> MyClass();
> 
> I don't know why he likes that syntax.  He's a big opponent of 
> "easy-to-mess-up" syntax, and I sure can't see much of a difference between 
> "c = MyClass()" and "c = new MyClass()". 
> 
>