MIT Technology Review: An Interview With Bjarne Stroustrup

[Craig Black]

Perhaps.  But why not do this by default and spare everyone the headache?

-Craig

"Sean Kelly" <sean at f4.ca> wrote in message 
news:el75b4$1ho3$2 at digitaldaemon.com...
> Craig Black wrote:
>> I don't see why D doesn't use nedmalloc for its non-GC malloc 
>> implementation.  This would allow expert developers that avoid GC in 
>> certain situations glean the best performance possible.
>
> The user could do this quite easily himself.  Just create a D header 
> module for the malloc calls and use them instead of std.c.stdlib.malloc, 
> etc.
>
>
> Sean