D's templates now seem weak to me...

[Oskar Linde]

Ben Phillips wrote:

> instead of having to write "something!(int).someFunction(i)" (which seems
> excessively verbose for one function) you could write someFunction!(int)(i)

You can do this if you name the template the same as the function. This 
has nothing to do with the template being defined by the short or long 
form. Read under Implicit Template Properties in the docs.

/Oskar