Intel Based Macs and DMD?

[Anders F Björklund]

John Reimer wrote:

>> However, new Darwin 8 is *much* less polished than what Darwin 7 was.
>> This is probably because OpenDarwin has run into some "troubles"...
>> (see the recent story http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200602/apple.html)
> 
> 8 is much less polished?  Wow, that's strange. I'll have to read the 
> story behind that.  Thanks for the link.

Well, I should clearify that...

Darwin 8.0.1 is about as polished as Darwin 7.0.1 was. (i.e. not at all)
These are Apple releases, and their efforts go into Mac OS X instead...

http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/

The difference lies in how much support can be found in the OpenDarwin
project, and they are currently offering OpenDarwin 7.2.1 (but not 8.x)

http://www.opendarwin.org/

And some of the reasons for *that*, can be found in the story above and
at the personal pages of Rob Braun: http://www.opendarwin.org/~bbraun/

--anders

BTW;
I find Mac OS X 10.3 better than Mac OS X 10.4 too, but that's just me.