If D becomes a failure, what's the key reason, do you think?

[Boris Wang]

"Brad Anderson" <brad at dsource.org> ??????:e8lo9m$aie$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
> Boris Wang wrote:
>> "Justin C Calvarese" <technocrat7 at gmail.com>
>> ??????:e8kqf9$1hri$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>>> Boris Wang wrote:
>>>> "Regan Heath" <regan at netwin.co.nz> ??????:optcaubjpw23k2f5 at nrage...
>>>>> Is this your way of asking "what part of D most bothers you and should
>>>>> be fixed before 1.0?"
>>>>> If so.. what's your opinion?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regan
>>>>>
>>>> No, may be something beyond the language itself.
>>> Like the power of negative thinking?
>>>
>>> In my thinking, D should already be more popular than C++ and Java. 
>>> Sure,
>>> D could benefit from having more cool libraries available (but if there
>>> were a few thousand more fans of D out there it, we could fix that 
>>> problem
>>> in just a few weeks). ;)
>>
>> Hmm,may be, first of all, you can make patch for D, or you can take part 
>> in
>> the decision of a feature.
>
> So Boris,
>
> I take this comment to mean you question jcc7's contribution to the D 
> world.

Where can you got this result?
                                                                             
                            (but if there
>>> were a few thousand more fans of D out there it, we could fix that 
>>> problem
>>> in just a few weeks). ;)

>>
>> Hmm,may be, first of all, you can make patch for D, or you can take part 
>> in
>> the decision of a feature.

Please put your eyes close to the screen.