If D becomes a failure, what's the key reason, do you think?

Boris Wang nano.kago at hotmail.com
Fri Jul 7 12:59:34 PDT 2006


I'm sorry. I should say:
    first of all, we can make patch for D, or we can take part in
    the decision of a feature

"Brad Anderson" <brad at dsource.org> ??????:e8lo9m$aie$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
> Boris Wang wrote:
>> "Justin C Calvarese" <technocrat7 at gmail.com>
>> ??????:e8kqf9$1hri$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>>> Boris Wang wrote:
>>>> "Regan Heath" <regan at netwin.co.nz> ??????:optcaubjpw23k2f5 at nrage...
>>>>> Is this your way of asking "what part of D most bothers you and should
>>>>> be fixed before 1.0?"
>>>>> If so.. what's your opinion?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regan
>>>>>
>>>> No, may be something beyond the language itself.
>>> Like the power of negative thinking?
>>>
>>> In my thinking, D should already be more popular than C++ and Java. 
>>> Sure,
>>> D could benefit from having more cool libraries available (but if there
>>> were a few thousand more fans of D out there it, we could fix that 
>>> problem
>>> in just a few weeks). ;)
>>
>> Hmm,may be, first of all, you can make patch for D, or you can take part 
>> in
>> the decision of a feature.
>
> So Boris,
>
> I take this comment to mean you question jcc7's contribution to the D 
> world.
> And yet all it says to me is that you are wallowing about in the abyss of
> ignorance, having been mercifully spared the ravages of intelligence.
>
> Let's look at the stats:
>
>                jcc7                     boris
>
> First Post    Nov. 2002                April 2006
>
> # of posts
>  NG's          1058                      35
>  dsource        442                       3
>
> Projects       core32                     any?
>               dsource tutorials
>               wiki4d
>               d2html
>
> Skills         info bloodhound         hollow bitching in the NG
>
> Frankly I'm surprised that I replied to your bullshit post (twice), as I
> usually leave garbage like this alone.  Others here should too, but we're
> sensitive and proud of our work on D.  And we don't need you questioning 
> one
> of our own.  We freely admit there are things wrong with D and talk about 
> them
> a lot here in the NG.  Please read the posts from before you started 
> posting
> for many answers to your question and cut down on the noise in here.
>
> In summary, shut the fuck up.
>
> BA
>
>
> 





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list