import concerns (was Re: Historical language survey)

[Walter Bright]

Sean Kelly wrote:
> This would be the alternate interpretation of the "issue of whether the 
> contents of x.y.z are visible without the 'foo' qualifier" in my last 
> post.  Personally, I think either interpretation would work as I believe 
> collisions only occur when a lookup is being processed, not simply 
> because the symbols happen to exist in the various modules,

That is correct.