If D becomes a failure, what's the key reason, do you think?

[Boris Wang]

Thank you put right what i got wrong.


"Derek Parnell" <derek at psych.ward> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:op.tccedhvz6b8z09 at ginger.vic.bigpond.net.au...
> On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 05:59:19 +1000, Lars Ivar Igesund 
> <larsivar at igesund.net> wrote:
>
>> Boris Wang wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Brad Anderson" <brad at dsource.org>
>>> ??????:e8lo9m$aie$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>>>> Boris Wang wrote:
>>>>> "Justin C Calvarese" <technocrat7 at gmail.com>
>>>>> ??????:e8kqf9$1hri$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>>>>>> Boris Wang wrote:
>>>>>>> "Regan Heath" <regan at netwin.co.nz> ??????:optcaubjpw23k2f5 at nrage...
>>>>>>>> Is this your way of asking "what part of D most bothers you and
>>>>>>>> should be fixed before 1.0?"
>>>>>>>> If so.. what's your opinion?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, may be something beyond the language itself.
>>>>>> Like the power of negative thinking?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In my thinking, D should already be more popular than C++ and Java.
>>>>>> Sure,
>>>>>> D could benefit from having more cool libraries available (but if 
>>>>>> there
>>>>>> were a few thousand more fans of D out there it, we could fix that
>>>>>> problem
>>>>>> in just a few weeks). ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm,may be, first of all, you can make patch for D, or you can take 
>>>>> part
>>>>> in
>>>>> the decision of a feature.
>>>>
>>>> So Boris,
>>>>
>>>> I take this comment to mean you question jcc7's contribution to the D
>>>> world.
>>>
>>> Where can you got this result?
>>>
>>
>> It might be your English, but it certainly was what I thought you said 
>> too.
>
> I took it mean...
>
> "Hmmm... maybe. However, other than Walter, can anyone make a patch for D, 
> or can anyone take part in the decision to implement, reject or design a 
> feature?"
>
>
>
> -- 
> Derek Parnell
> Melbourne, Australia