If D becomes a failure, what's the key reason, do you think?

[kris]

Walter Bright wrote:

> So what do you say we just call D right now *1.0* and move on? It's not 
> like D will stop undergoing improvements.
> 

Er, perhaps private should actually mean "private" before that happens? 
And, package should mean "package", protected mean "protected" and so 
on? It seems the whole visibility thing broke down completely fairly 
recently. It used to work nicely!