If D becomes a failure, what's the key reason, do you think?

[Derek Parnell]

On Sat, 08 Jul 2006 13:42:18 +1000, Walter Bright  
<newshound at digitalmars.com> wrote:

> Kyle Furlong wrote:
>> *Standing Ovation*
>
> Yeah, that's concerned me as well. But it isn't just me trying to make  
> it perfect, everyone's got their favorite bug/feature that must get in  
> before 1.0.
>
> So what do you say we just call D right now *1.0* and move on? It's not  
> like D will stop undergoing improvements.
>

Yes! Additional improvements will then show that it is getting even better  
and that it is not abandoned.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia