import concerns (was Re: Historical language survey)

[Carlos Santander]

Walter Bright escribió:
> kris wrote:
>> Walter Bright wrote:
>>
>>> What can also be done is extend the import declaration to allow the 
>>> .'s to continue so that specific symbols can be imported.
>>
>> Now that would be great. I believe selective-importing (as an option) 
>> would be a boon in a number of ways ~ and would resolve this issue 
>> quite elegantly.
> 
> I like this one better, too.
> 
> 

I like it too, but I have a question: how far would it go? Would we be able to 
do this:

//----------

module a;

class Foo
{
	enum Bar { ... }
	
	struct Baz
	{
		const something = ...;
	}
}

//----------

module b;

import a.Foo.Bar;
import a.Foo.Baz.something;

//----------

Or just module members?

-- 
Carlos Santander Bernal