import concerns (was Re: Historical language survey)

[Walter Bright]

Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> I must contested the proposed named by Walter. "static import" seems a 
> pretty crappy name, there is nothing "static" about it. Do we have to 
> recycle existing keywords? I'm not very much into this phobia of 
> introducing new keywords. You didn't have a problem introducing 
> "scope"... :P

Turns out, "scope" was a problem. It broke a lot of my code - a lot more 
than I'd anticipated.