Import concerns revisited

[kris]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Ivan Senji wrote:
> 
>> Sure I could use
>>
>> static import m2;
>> alias m2.func f2;
>>
>> And that would be an improvement but it is still longer (and arguably
>> less understandable) than:
>>
>> import m2.func as f2; ;) :)
> 
> 
> Let's say you're going to do more than one:
> 
> static import m2;
> alias m2.func f2;
> alias m2.abcd f3;
> alias m2.efgh f4;
> 
> vs:
> 
> import m2.func as f2;
> import m2.abcd as f3;
> import m2.efgh as f4;
> 
> Not much of a difference. I'm also not understanding why alias is hard 
> to understand.


You've seen the requested syntax for this option, Walter. Let's revisit 
it again:

# with m2 import func, abcd, efgh;