Import concerns revisited

[Sean Kelly]

Deewiant wrote:
> John Reimer wrote:
>> Also, for selective import, I think using "from" instead of "with" looks much
>> better.
>>
> 
> "from" is a quite common variable name though, so introducing it as a keyword
> would probably break a lot of code.

Yup, thus the suggestion of using "with" instead: it's already a keyword 
with similar meaning, and it should be fairly easy to disambiguate at 
the parse stage by looking ahead for "import".


Sean