Import proposals (Ideas)
Oskar Linde
oskar.lindeREM at OVEgmail.com
Mon Jul 10 11:17:21 PDT 2006
2 comments:
Dave skrev:
> Regan Heath wrote:
>> Sub-thread for ideas.
>
> My preference for syntax and semantics would be:
>
> // regular import w/ optional alias (*)
> import std.stdio, std.c.stdlib as stdlib, std.date;
>
> // symbol specific lookup w/ optional alias (**)
> import from std.stdio writef, writefln as print, readf;
How would the parser disambiguate the import of the module readf from
the symbol readf in std.stdio?
> // combined
> import std.stdio, from std.thread wait as wait, pause, std.date as date;
>
> * Importing an entire module as an alias would then require a FQN to
> access any of the members, for example given the above:
> malloc(...); // error
> std.c.stdlib.malloc(...); // error
> stdlib.malloc(...); // Ok
>
> ** A specific symbol that was not aliased would require a FQN to access.
> For example from above:
> std.stdio.writef(...);
Just to clarify, does this mean that to import std.c.stdlib as FQN only,
you would have to do:
import std.c.stdlib as std.c.stdlib; //(1)
Or, indirectly:
import from std.c.stdlib a_symbol_I_will_never_use;
?
1) When you import something as fqn-only, you must be ok with typing out
the full name quite a lot, so once more will not make much of a
difference I guess...
/Oskar
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list