If D becomes a failure, what's the key reason, do you think?

[Georg Wrede]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Kyle Furlong wrote:
> 
>> *Standing Ovation*
> 
> 
> Yeah, that's concerned me as well. But it isn't just me trying to make 
> it perfect, everyone's got their favorite bug/feature that must get in 
> before 1.0.
> 
> So what do you say we just call D right now *1.0* and move on? It's not 
> like D will stop undergoing improvements.

I support that!

(Except protection and module logic simply have to be fixed in 1.0.
And I don't want the const issue touched before 1.1.)

Actually, now is a good time of the year to do this. Come fall, everyone 
will be buzzing about D 1.0!

And, please, buy 3 hours of professional PR-consulting right now -- you 
won't regret it!