Proposals: Synchronization
Chris Miller
chris at dprogramming.com
Sat Jul 22 21:50:28 PDT 2006
I agree with everything in your proposal!
C# also allows you to lock() on a string literal/constant. I think this
works because a string is just another object that can be locked on, and
all string literals with the same text end up becoming one string object.
This is very handy. Perhaps D could allow locking/synchronizing on string
literals by having the compiler to create a static Lock instance for each
unique string literal used for synchronization.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list