Is D 0.163 D 1.0?

Walter Bright newshound at digitalmars.com
Sun Jul 23 14:14:43 PDT 2006


Dave wrote:
> IIRC, Walter has recently stated that D is already as stable as many 
> compilers out there. We happen to have a highly visible bug list and 
> regression tests that probably make things look worse than they really 
> are _relative to other compilers_ who don't publish this stuff. In other 
> words by objective measurement we may already have a "complete product" 
> as far as the compilers and language spec. go.

It isn't unusual for a professional compiler system out there to have 
thousands of unresolved items in the internal bug database.

The crucial question is if those problems impede the normal use of the 
product.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list