Proposals: Synchronization

[Kent Boogaart]

> This would make this currently legal syntax illegal:
>
> void fn() {
>     synchronized {
>         // stuff
>     }
> }
>
> ie. where the synchronization object is implicit.  I suppose its value is 
> debatable, but I think it's sufficiently useful that I wouldn't want it to 
> be illegal.
>

I see that as a good thing, though. That is because the implicit syntax is 
locking on this (I assume), which - as discussed - is a bad thing.

Regards,
Kent Boogaart