Is D 0.163 D 1.0?

[Andrei Khropov]

Derek wrote:

> If so, it means that the opCall paradigm will be removed from classes. Is
> that intentional?
> 
> And I assume that if the class was declared as ...
> 
>   auto class A {}
> 
> then every object declared with the class would have to be ..
> 
>   A a = A();
> or
>   auto a = A();
> 
> But how does this proposed syntax handle variable-length arrays?
> 
>   char[] a = read(filename);
> 
> Is 'a' destroyed at end of scope?
> 
> It seems to me that the implied 'destroy at end of scope' idea is not a
> good one. It needs explicit designation to make it clear to readers and
> coders alike. That must also help compilers in detecting coding mistakes
> too.

Yes, good point. I agree.

-- 
AKhropov