appeal again: discard the syntax of private:, public: static: private{}, public{}, static{}.

Boris Wang nano.kago at hotmail.com
Sat Jun 24 03:39:54 PDT 2006


What you said is that, i can't has a good feeling about reading your 
program, just because i has not such  a editor?

In other words, you force the other readers to use the editor you use?

"Derek Parnell" <derek at psych.ward> дÈëÏûÏ¢ÐÂÎÅ:op.tbml4bwn6b8z09 at ginger.vic.bigpond.net.au...
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 10:22:00 +1000, Boris Wang <nano.kago at hotmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> And this is what ?
>>
>>>
>>>       // six pages
>>>      ...
>>>
>>>        int func3(...)
>>>        {
>>>        }
>>>        int func4(...)
>>>        {
>>>        }
>>>        int func5(...)
>>>        {
>>>        }
>>>        int func6(...)
>>>        {
>>>        }
>>>        int func7(...)
>>>        {
>>>        }
>>>        a_type var2;
>>>     }
>>>     int func2(...)
>>>     {
>>>     }
>>>     a_type var4;
>>>     int func5(...)
>>>     {
>>>     }
>>> }
>
> Excellent, that is what it is. To find out whether it is 
> public/private/static/version/debug effected, place your cursor on the 
> final "}" and press ctrl-[ to jump to the matching brace. This assumes you 
> are using Crimson Editor of course ;-)
>
> The point is, writing organised and predicatable code is less costly in 
> the long run. We also have access to tools (i.e good editors) that can 
> help us.
>
> -- 
> Derek Parnell
> Melbourne, Australia 





More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list