static and protection

[Hasan Aljudy]

Kyle Furlong wrote:
> John C wrote:
> 
>> It appears that protection attributes on static class methods don't 
>> get recognised. This compiles without errors:
>>
>>     module stuff;
>>
>>     class Visible {
>>         private static void hidden() {}
>>     }
>>
>>     -----8<-----
>>     module program;
>>
>>     import stuff;
>>
>>     void main() {
>>         Visible.hidden();
>>     }
>>
>> An error is issued if hidden() is at module level. I sometimes feel 
>> that classes are second-class citizens in D.
>>
> 
> This protection stuff is rediculous, any modern OO language needs to 
> handle these things well.

Yeah, and the implicit module friendship is rediculous too!!! The whole 
C++ friend concept is rediclous.