static and protection

[Hasan Aljudy]

Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
> "Jarrett Billingsley" <kb3ctd2 at yahoo.com> wrote in message 
> news:du4vft$1isn$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
> 
>>"Hasan Aljudy" <hasan.aljudy at gmail.com> wrote in message 
>>news:du4ulf$1hpp$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
>>
>>>>This protection stuff is rediculous, any modern OO language needs to 
>>>>handle these things well.
>>>
>>>Yeah, and the implicit module friendship is rediculous too!!! The whole 
>>>C++ friend concept is rediclous.
>>
>>Actually, nothing is "rediculous," only "r_i_diculous" ;)
>>
>>Implicit module friendship works well.  Do you have a better suggestion?
> 
> 
> I just realized you may have been being sarcastic. 
> 
> 
No ..
friendship works, my point was that it shouldn't be there in the first 
place, it's not part of the OO paradigm, it's a hack introduced by C++