Today the Hobbyist, Tommorow, The World!

[charles]

A huge improvement yes.

ButWhatsWithAllTheCamelCaseing :P.

Charlie

"jcc7" <jcc7_member at pathlink.com> wrote in message
news:e3ah77$2tr8$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
> In article <e3adn8$2nbl$1 at digitaldaemon.com>, charles says...
> >
> >> No offense to those running wiki4d, but it looks like an abandoned site
> >> from mid 1990s.
> >
> >I totally agree, its not the content , its prowiki;  it sucks.  I know
thats
> >offense to someone,  but compared with any other wiki it looks extremely
> >lackluster.
>
> Charles, have you looked at Wiki4D today? (I changed the template last
night.)
>
> http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?FrontPage
>
>
> >Its built on perl ?  Trash it.  I can host a new site if someone can move
> >over the content -- prowiki looks awful and is impossible to navigate.
>
> Come on now. Other that maybe the hint of .cgi in the URL, how would the
average
> person even know what it's written in? It's probably written in Perl
because the
> earliest wikis were written in Perl. If this really matters to you, Helmut
has
> mentioned that he's thought about porting it to D (I don't remember if he
still
> plans to do that).
>
> As to the navigation issue, that's probably my fault since I've created
many of
> the pages and always end up putting random links everywhere. We probably
need to
> rename a bunch of the pages or reorganize the content. But that's not
ProWiki's
> fault.
>
> jcc7