why scope(success)?
BCS
BCS at pathlink.com
Tue May 9 12:23:49 PDT 2006
Ben Hinkle wrote:
> I hope this doesn't come of as a flame, but I'm wondering if anyone is using
> scope(success) and why. I can't find any reason for it.
>
> Some background: I've slowed my D work to focus on some C experimental
> features I'm calling Cx: http://www.tinycx.org and currently I'm
> implementing the error handling using reserved labels "error:" and
> "finally:". The error label is roughly like scope(failure) and the finally
> label is roughly like scope(exit). There's no try-catch-finally. I don't
> plan on adding anything like scope(success) because I couldn't think of why
> anyone would want to use it. Why not just put the code at the end of the
> scope like normal code-flow? I suppose one could code the entire scope in
> reverse just for kicks:
> void main() {
> scope(success) printf("world\n");
> scope(success) printf("hello ");
> }
>
> -Ben
>
>
int fn(int i)
{
scope(success) printf("Good\n");
scope(failure) printf("Bad\n");
/* big huge logic block with a bazillion returns and throws +/
}
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list