suggestion of implicit new

[Craig Black]

"Tom S" <h3r3tic at remove.mat.uni.torun.pl> wrote in message 
news:e5l5o1$1foc$1 at digitaldaemon.com...
> shinichiro.h wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I guess D syntax can allow implicit new expression like following:
>>
>> class C {
>>   this() {}
>>   this(int x) {}
>> }
>> void func() {
>>   C c = C();  // not new C()
>>   c = C(3);   // not new C(3)
>> }
>>
>> I think the syntax is cute. And the syntax is not ambiguous and does
>> not make DMD slower. I have succeeded to implement the syntax into
>
> Well, it is ambiguous if the class contains a static opCall, but then 
> again, I'd suggest that syntax instead of the current 'auto' storage 
> modifier.

I'll second that.  It seems like the nicest proposal so far to eliminate the 
multiple meanings of "auto".

-Craig