Prime time???

Sean Kelly sean at f4.ca
Fri Nov 3 16:39:24 PST 2006


Gregor Richards wrote:
> 
> In my opinion, if D branched into D 1.0 (stable) and D 2.0 (unstable), a 
> large enough chunk of people would continue to use the unstable branch 
> that everybody else would be snowballed in by dependencies et cetera. 
> Net accomplishment: Nothing.

hehe, you're probably right.  My only issue is that I don't want the 
introduction of new features to break existing functionality.  So long 
as that's a pretty reasonable guarantee, I'm all for a single unified 
compiler release.


Sean



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list