1.0 ??

[Lars Ivar Igesund]

Georg Wrede wrote:

> 1.0?
> 
> Does that imply a simultaneous 1.0 for D and DMD??

In general it should not, although DMD for D is useful to test if the spec
actually works. Now, the spec is "unstable" enough, especially regarding
mixins, variadic templates and more, for D 1.0 not to be ready (IMO). That
DMD goes 1.0, I wouldn't care too much about. What will be important is
that once the D spec is said to be stable, consistent and correctly
written, there needs to be a way to compile a program according to that
spec.

That is, if only one DMD branch is kept, it needs to be able to do -std=D1.0
and -std=exp (or similar).

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource & #D: larsivi