Prime time???

[Bruno Medeiros]

Samuel MV wrote:
> I see your point. But I think it's not the same to break code because of a bug,
> that because of there is a change in the way templates, variadic, delegates or
> operator overload works.
> 
> I know that 1.00 it's only a number, that DMD 0.173 it's better than C++ 12.00 (it
> was better with 0.73). I'm only asking for two branches: 'stable' and
> 'development', to make things more ease for developers.
> 
> I want to use D, but I need to get the things done in my job, I need to solve the
> problems of an application, not fight with the language.
> 

I think Walter is right, the code changes introduced by new features 
(not bugs) are very rarely backwards-incompatible (even more rarely that 
they should be, IMO, but that's another story), so I don't see as valid 
this idea that you have to refactor your code with each new major 
release. If you don't have time to use, or don't want to use the new 
features of a release, simply don't, you won't be any worse because of that.

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - MSc in CS/E student
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BrunoMedeiros#D