1.0 ??

[RA]

== Quote from Georg Wrede (georg.wrede at nospam.org)'s article
> We might also promise to not publish a new (stable) version within 12
> months of 1.0. (This may really be a more important promise for the
> customers and prospective developers and consultants than we here
> realize just off-hand.)


I wouldn't want to hear a promise like that.  To me, it makes it sound like
there's definately not going to be any new improvements\features for at least the
next year.

I think you would be better off not making any statement about the "next"
version... period.

If you really want to promise anything, something along the lines of "All
updates\versions\releases will be backwards compatible with 1.0 for the next 12
months (or until 2.0), except for unintended 'features' caused by bugs." would be
plenty to imply a stable platform.

Just my opinion of course.