Iterator straw-man

Bill Baxter wbaxter at gmail.com
Wed Nov 8 13:18:27 PST 2006


Sean Kelly wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
> 
>> Sean Kelly wrote:
>>

> 
> Following the D convention, the 'op' prefix suggests a use form 
> different from that of a normal function call.  Personally, I'd be fine 
> with this done as plain old property methods: fwdIt/revIt, or something 
> along those lines.

That's true.  With all current uses you could see the 'op' as synonymous 
with "you ain't never gonna call this directly".   So something intended 
to be called directly doesn't necessarily have to follow that convention.

--bb



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list