OSNews article about C++09 degenerates into C++ vs. D discussion

[Georg Wrede]

BCS wrote:
> Mars wrote:
> 
>> http://www.osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=16526
> 
> One issue brought up is that of D "requiring" the use of a GC.
> What would it take to prove that wrong by making a full blown standard 
> lib that doesn't use a GC, and in fact doesn't have a GC?
> 
> It would be painful to work with but no more so than in C++. OTOH with 
> scope() and such, it might be easy.
> 
> Anyway, just a thought.

Having such a library would make a huge difference in every C++ vs D 
discussion! The opposition would have a lot less ammunition against us.