Performance of method calls

Walter Bright newshound at digitalmars.com
Thu Nov 30 00:34:55 PST 2006


Daniel Keep wrote:
> I just recompiled and re-ran with some different flags.  The results 
> are... interesting.
> 
> (Numbers are #1/#2 and #3/#2)
> 
> -O: 1.39892 and 3.61384
> -O -release: 1.00703 and 1.0163
> -O -inline: 1.89054 and 13.4001
> -O -release -inline: 1.8257 and 1.00007
> 
> Now I've got *no* idea what to think :P

You really need to use obj2asm on the results. It'll make things a lot 
more sensible!



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list