D : Not for me anymore

[Jari-Matti Mäkelä]

John Reimer wrote:
> As for standard libraries, I think you should be ready to endorse
> an organized effort that presents itself with these traits:
> 
> 1. Is well documented
> 2. Meets the general approval of the community
> 3. Continues to be developed for multiple compilers in tandem (dmd
> and gdc)
> 4. Is actively developed for multiple platforms (linux, win32, Mac
> OS X)
> 5. Has a strategy layed out for future direction
> 6. Has a dedicated core group of developers that have shown
> dedication to the D language.
> 7. Is maintained under a version control system
> 
> Such traits by far surpass what Phobos can offer.  From my
> perspective, the act of endorsing such an effort hardly constitutes
> a risk.

Amen to that :)