Anyone interested in a Spirit for D?

[Walter Bright]

Paolo Invernizzi wrote:
> Walter Bright wrote:
> 
>> I think it would be worth looking at again. The C# version of it 
>> doesn't use operator overloading or even templates.
> 
>> 3) it's been touted as a reason why D is no good and C++ roolz
> 
> As a Spirit user, I can tell that readability is one of the most 
> important factor. So, IMHO, if you want to target your 'point 3', I 
> think you must have at least the same amount of operator overloading you 
> can have in C++.
> 
> Or C++ guys will continue to argue that D is no good and C++ roolz. ;-P

You're probably right.