Maybe we don't need foreach ;-)
Reiner Pope
reiner.pope at REMOVE.THIS.gmail.com
Mon Oct 30 20:56:20 PST 2006
I don't see much reason to change the syntax here, since:
- it provides no generalizations/abstractions
- it only saves 4 keys of typing
- it isn't easier to read; perhaps even *harder* (you don't know
whether it is a custom iterator or a 'normal' for loop)
- Walter's right: it could increase bugs, such as:
for (char[] key, char[] value; aggregate)
which looks similar to
for (char[] key; char[] value; aggregate)
Cheers,
Reiner
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list