Maybe we don't need foreach ;-)

[Bill Baxter]

Walter Bright wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> Assuming you mean literally a b and c, it's pretty clear it's got to 
>> be a foreach that was intended.  There's no reason to stick a variable 
>> in either the first or last clause of a standard for.
> 
> There is if a and b are function names.

I see.  I didn't realize this property stuff extended to plain functions 
too.  I would be strongly inclined to wedgie anyone who made extensive 
use of that feature.  :-)

--bb