Some more template syntax sugar

Walter Bright newshound at digitalmars.com
Sat Sep 2 13:14:31 PDT 2006


Reiner Pope wrote:
> Thoughts, anyone?

1) Lots of people like nameless parameters to implicitly document that 
the parameter isn't used.

2) Nameless parameters come up an awful lot in C/C++ header files - I 
think they're expected.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list