Why there are no 'physical' object variables (only references)?

[Sean Kelly]

Kristian wrote:
> 
> Hmm, what if structures could have interfaces and 
> constructors/destructors... and what the heck, inheritance too? Hehheh, 
> this way we would have 'physical classes' for local use and 'reference 
> classes' for global use.

It will never happen :-)  Though ctor support would be nice, at the very 
least.  That would simplify initialization and eliminate the need for 
the static opCall trick.


Sean