size_t, size_t, wherefore art thou aliased?

Frank Benoit keinfarbton at nospam.xyz
Sat Sep 23 11:15:42 PDT 2006


Hasan Aljudy schrieb:
> I think I don't really understand the issue, but I'm gonna throw in my 2
> cents anyway ... even though it might sound pretty stupid:
> 
> Wouldn't a versioned alias declaration solve this?
> 
> version( X32 )
> {
>   alias something ...
> }
> version( X64 )
> {
>   alias something else ...
> }
> 

I think this is exactly like size_t is defined. And the problem Gregor
describes is a result from that.




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list