standardization of D

[Lars Ivar Igesund]

Ameer Armaly wrote:

> 
> "janderson" <askme at me.com> wrote in message
> news:ev1u1d$1q81$1 at digitalmars.com...
>> Although you raise some good points I can't agree here.  I think D still
>> has a few more years development until we get to that stage.  People are
>> only just starting to use it for real.  We should have the flexibility to
>> fix their issues as they arise rather then setting it in stone at the
>> moment.  I see 1.0 as kinda like a speedbump to stability.  The more we
>> go
>> over the more set in stone it'll get.  I think this will be a much more
>> valid argument at 2.0 and even more so at 3.0.
>>
> It seems then that we interpret 1.0 in different ways; my first thought
> was that it was going to be a setup (language, compiler, libs) that people
> could just pick up and run with. But apparently not...

That would have been ideal, but if that really was the case, 1.0 was rushed
out way too early :)

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango