Phobos vs Tango! What's your opinion?

[Frits van Bommel]

Dan wrote:
> As I just said in a different thread.  Tango has this OO gleam in it's eye.  It's implementing classes for the craziest of things.  Strings don't need a class!  Implementing a class to store an array is *hugely* wasteful.
[snip]

I think you may be a bit confused. Nobody was talking about a string 
class here.
What we were talking about was the fact that Tango has renamed 
Object.toString (which returns char[]) to object.toUtf8, and now when 
compiled with -version=PhobosCompatibility has "alias toUtf8 toString;" 
added to Object.

I was pointing out that classes that override toString won't work even 
with that line added, since aliases can't be overridden.