A different kind of Walter? :-)

[0ffh]

Lionello Lunesu wrote:
> Well, that was *exactly* what I was getting at! OK, granted, it's only done 
> in 4KB increments, but that's when a regular array resize (copying the 
> contents over to a new place) would actually start harming performance.

That sounds enticing!
If you could put garbage collection into the kernel - even with tile-sized
granularity - that would make many things easier. And finally put the idle
thread to good use... :-)))


Regards, Frank