The in operator and normal arrays

[Bill Baxter]

Myron Alexander wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>> I've proposed this before.  Maybe others too.  It makes sense.  It's 
>> what other languages with an 'in' operator do.  It should work.  It 
>> doesn't.  It isn't high on Walter's priority list because it can be 
>> worked around easily.
>>
>> --bb
> 
> I suspected as much. Thanks for the info. I add my voice of support for 
> the proposal to expand the in operator to operate on normal arrays.
> 
> This is something that would be nice to have, but as you say, the 
> work-around is simple enough.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Myron Alexander.

I don't recall if I ever filed an enh request for it.  If you have time, 
you could check and see, and then file one if you don't find it there 
already.

--bb