Hijacking

[Julio César Carrascal Urquijo]

Chris Nicholson-Sauls wrote:
  > I don't think we really need a non-override keyword, and I wouldn't 
want
> 'final' to be given that effect either ('final override' should be a 
> valid attribute), or any other existing attributes... so our options are:
> 
> #1 - Add some sort of "plain" specifier, or a way to un-set a 'foo:' 
> attribute.  Maybe '!foo:' or similar.
> 
> #2 - Make a point of using 'override { ... }' instead.
> 
> ....I think I prefer #2.
> 
> -- Chris Nicholson-Sauls

#3 - Use default:

override:
	void foo() {}
	void bar() {}

default:
	void baz() {}

But then again, maybe in this case we should just use override {} or 
reorder methods.