[little ot]Re: Newly rewritten developer docs for DSSS
BCS
ao at pathlink.com
Thu Aug 9 10:13:38 PDT 2007
Reply to Gregor,
> I am very strongly considering it. In fact, I have a ticket on it.
>
> The only problem I see is that it would create a big Phobos-Tango
> schism. Basically, I'd like to maintain both a Phobos and a Tango
> branch, but if I do that, only the Tango branch will have scripting
> support. I'd hate for a build to not work because somebody has the
> Phobos version of DSSS installed ...
>
> My current consideration is to maintain the library portion in two
> branches, so that people making .d files importing DSSS can use
> either, but make the binary only compilable with Tango. Since I'll be
> distributing binaries, this may or may not be a problem.
>
> Anyway, none of this is going to happen before the conference. I need
> things to calm down :)
>
cool, Thanks.
> - Gregor Richards
>
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list