Hiding class pointers -- was it a good idea?

[Sean Kelly]

Deewiant wrote:
> 
> What I like about C++ is that "new" means "allocate on the heap". In D, you have
> to add "unless storing as 'scope'".

I'm not sure I agree.  Stack allocation from the presence of "scope" is 
a QOI issue, it's not guaranteed in the spec.  All "scope" really says 
is "destroy what this reference refers to when the reference goes out of 
scope."


Sean