inp/outp

Ingo Oeser ioe-news at rameria.de
Tue Aug 28 12:15:51 PDT 2007


Carlos Santander wrote:

> I remember that Walter once said that all in Phobos under std/ was
> standard, as a part of the D standard (I hope I'm getting my words right.)
> Thus, as Ingo said, a standard D compiler has to implement those things.

Yes, that's my point.
 
> In a way, it would be like expecting all OSes to have a registry. The
> sound solution was to put the Windows Registry stuff under std.windows. A
> D compiler that doesn't run on Windows wouldn't need to provide those
> modules. The same could be done for these intrinsics: put them in
> std.arch.x86.intrinsics, or something like that.

Yes, that sounds sane enough. And if you implement a D-compiler for AVR,
you don't need to implement that stuff.


Best Regards

Ingo Oeser



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list