Stroustrup's talk on C++0x

[kris]

Walter Bright wrote:
> eao197 wrote:
>> Unfortunately I see to D's evolution, perhabs, from 2002 or 2003 year. 
>> It looks as D have never been a stable language.
> 
> 
> I don't know any language in wide use that is stable (i.e. not 
> changing). A stable language is a dead language.

I guess there's "stable" and there's "stable"? The history of Simula67 
illustrates what can happen when a language is nailed to the wall :)