Stroustrup's talk on C++0x

[eao197]

On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:15:26 +0400, Walter Bright  
<newshound1 at digitalmars.com> wrote:

> eao197 wrote:
>> Unfortunately I see to D's evolution, perhabs, from 2002 or 2003 year.  
>> It looks as D have never been a stable language.
>
>
> I don't know any language in wide use that is stable (i.e. not  
> changing). A stable language is a dead language.

I mean changes in languages which break compatibility with previous code.  
AFAIK, successful languages always had some periods (usually 2-3 years,  
sometimes more) when there were no additions to language and new major  
version didn't break existing code (for example: Java, C#, Ruby, Python,  
even C++ sometimes).

-- 
Regards,
Yauheni Akhotnikau